...Eye

Address correspondence concerning this article to Alexander von Eye, Michigan State University, Department of Psychology, 119 Snyder Hall, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1117, USA; e-mail: VONEYE@PILOT.MSU.EDU. Alexander von Eye's work on this article was supported in part by NIAAA grant # 2RO1 AA7065. The authors are indebted to one of the two anonymous reviewers and to Jürgen Rost for helpful and stimulating discussions of earlier versions of this article.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

...interpretation

The exact statement is ``Der Unterschied zwischen den beiden Teilmengen von Merkmalen besteht nur auf der inhaltlichen oder interpretativen Ebene'' (Krauth, 1996, p. 138).

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

...design

The variable Drinking is fixed because an a priori determined number of alcohol consumers and resisters was included in the sample.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

...suicide

One might suspect that when the outcome variable is dichotomous types and antitypes always go hand in hand. This is obviously not the case. For instance, Pattern 121 constitutes a type, but Pattern 122 is far from constituting an antitype. Another example is the pattern pair 131 and 132 which both constitute antitypes.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.